South Central Connecticut Planning Region, CT
Migration of people and income, 2022–2023 filing years
Between the 2022 and 2023 filing years, South Central Connecticut Planning Region, CT saw a net loss of 1,330 tax-filing households and a net loss of 1,900 individuals. On net, the area lost $220.3M in associated adjusted gross income (AGI, nominal dollars). The largest inflow came from Naugatuck Valley Planning Region; the largest outflow went to Naugatuck Valley Planning Region. These figures cover federal income tax filers only and do not indicate why people moved.
Income (AGI) in and out
Where movers came from
- 1Naugatuck Valley Planning Region, CT1,515$96.9M
- 2Greater Bridgeport Planning Region, CT1,376$90.4M
- 3Capitol Planning Region, CT1,185$76.5M
- 4Lower Connecticut River Valley Planning Region, CT737$67.2M
- 5Western Connecticut Planning Region, CT736$68.7M
- 6Bronx County, NY355$19.2M
- 7New York County, NY331$48.4M
- 8Kings County, NY318$30.5M
- 9Queens County, NY279$19.8M
- 10Westchester County, NY236$19.8M
Where movers went
- 1Naugatuck Valley Planning Region, CT1,655$114.6M
- 2Capitol Planning Region, CT1,459$95.9M
- 3Lower Connecticut River Valley Planning Region, CT1,026$87.2M
- 4Greater Bridgeport Planning Region, CT827$60.7M
- 5Western Connecticut Planning Region, CT511$50.6M
- 6New York County, NY476$58.8M
- 7Kings County, NY308$21.6M
- 8Southeastern Connecticut Planning Region, CT302$23.1M
- 9Middlesex County, MA274$41.1M
- 10Suffolk County, MA247$17.6M
Net migration by year
| Year | Net AGI | Net people |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -$152.7M | -2,221 |
| 2023 | -$220.3M | -1,900 |
Get the next update for South Central Connecticut Planning Region, CT
The IRS releases new migration data once a year. Drop your email and we will send the refreshed numbers when they land. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
Source: IRS Statistics of Income migration data (public domain). Covers federal income tax filers only; AGI is nominal (not inflation adjusted). These numbers describe movement of filers and their reported income, not why people moved or economic loss. Methodology and caveats.