Kent County, RI
Migration of people and income, 2022–2023 filing years
Between the 2022 and 2023 filing years, Kent County, RI saw a net gain of 311 tax-filing households and a net gain of 417 individuals. On net, the area gained $7.6M in associated adjusted gross income (AGI, nominal dollars). The largest inflow came from Providence County; the largest outflow went to Providence County. These figures cover federal income tax filers only and do not indicate why people moved.
Income (AGI) in and out
Where movers came from
- 1Providence County, RI2,400$155.6M
- 2Washington County, RI557$48.3M
- 3Bristol County, MA201$13.2M
- 4Norfolk County, MA88$8.3M
- 5Middlesex County, MA75$9.5M
- 6Worcester County, MA65$4.5M
- 7Southeastern Connecticut Planning Region, CT63$7.1M
- 8Suffolk County, MA55$8.4M
- 9Plymouth County, MA45$3.6M
- 10Northeastern Connecticut Planning Region, CT44$2.4M
Where movers went
- 1Providence County, RI1,891$127.2M
- 2Washington County, RI512$43.7M
- 3Northeastern Connecticut Planning Region, CT140$7.9M
- 4Bristol County, MA134$7.6M
- 5Southeastern Connecticut Planning Region, CT106$6.0M
- 6Middlesex County, MA70$4.7M
- 7Suffolk County, MA69$5.1M
- 8Worcester County, MA61$3.8M
- 9Norfolk County, MA39$3.5M
- 10Capitol Planning Region, CT32$2.4M
Net migration by year
| Year | Net AGI | Net people |
|---|---|---|
| 2012 | -$35.9M | -206 |
| 2013 | +$8.5M | +275 |
| 2014 | -$29.7M | -445 |
| 2015 | -$5.0M | -58 |
| 2016 | -$15.6M | +150 |
| 2017 | -$45.0M | +168 |
| 2018 | -$20.2M | +222 |
| 2019 | -$44.1M | +657 |
| 2020 | +$11.8M | +394 |
| 2021 | +$26.2M | +874 |
| 2022 | -$7.3M | +602 |
| 2023 | +$7.6M | +417 |
Get the next update for Kent County, RI
The IRS releases new migration data once a year. Drop your email and we will send the refreshed numbers when they land. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
Source: IRS Statistics of Income migration data (public domain). Covers federal income tax filers only; AGI is nominal (not inflation adjusted). These numbers describe movement of filers and their reported income, not why people moved or economic loss. Methodology and caveats.