Matanuska-Susitna Borough, AK
Migration of people and income, 2022–2023 filing years
Between the 2022 and 2023 filing years, Matanuska-Susitna Borough, AK saw a net gain of 380 tax-filing households and a net gain of 996 individuals. On net, the area gained $65.2M in associated adjusted gross income (AGI, nominal dollars). The largest inflow came from Anchorage Municipality; the largest outflow went to Anchorage Municipality. These figures cover federal income tax filers only and do not indicate why people moved.
Income (AGI) in and out
Where movers came from
- 1Anchorage Municipality, AK1,023$88.2M
- 2Kenai Peninsula Borough, AK122$7.6M
- 3Fairbanks North Star Borough, AK117$8.7M
- 4Maricopa County, AZ43$3.0M
- 5Juneau City and Borough, AK39$3.3M
- 6Pierce County, WA30$2.1M
- 7King County, WA27$2.2M
- 8Kodiak Island Borough, AK24$2.0M
- 9Clark County, WA21$2.3M
- 10Clark County, NV21$1.0M
Where movers went
- 1Anchorage Municipality, AK697$39.9M
- 2Kenai Peninsula Borough, AK79$5.6M
- 3Fairbanks North Star Borough, AK72$4.5M
- 4Maricopa County, AZ49$3.6M
- 5Copper River Census Area, AK28$1.3M
- 6Pima County, AZ26$1.5M
- 7Pinal County, AZ25$1.7M
- 8Ada County, ID23$1.4M
- 9Pierce County, WA22$1.3M
- 10Clark County, NV21$1.5M
Net migration by year
| Year | Net AGI | Net people |
|---|---|---|
| 2012 | +$23.1M | +994 |
| 2013 | -$9.4M | +504 |
| 2014 | +$27.8M | +1,259 |
| 2015 | +$27.9M | +965 |
| 2016 | +$53.5M | +2,176 |
| 2017 | +$38.7M | +1,506 |
| 2018 | +$19.0M | +346 |
| 2019 | +$18.2M | +571 |
| 2020 | +$46.2M | +1,667 |
| 2021 | +$83.3M | +2,301 |
| 2022 | +$77.1M | +1,512 |
| 2023 | +$65.2M | +996 |
Get the next update for Matanuska-Susitna Borough, AK
The IRS releases new migration data once a year. Drop your email and we will send the refreshed numbers when they land. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
Source: IRS Statistics of Income migration data (public domain). Covers federal income tax filers only; AGI is nominal (not inflation adjusted). These numbers describe movement of filers and their reported income, not why people moved or economic loss. Methodology and caveats.