Alameda County, CA
Migration of people and income, 2022–2023 filing years
Between the 2022 and 2023 filing years, Alameda County, CA saw a net loss of 8,347 tax-filing households and a net loss of 18,573 individuals. On net, the area lost $1.4B in associated adjusted gross income (AGI, nominal dollars). The largest inflow came from Santa Clara County; the largest outflow went to Contra Costa County. These figures cover federal income tax filers only and do not indicate why people moved.
Income (AGI) in and out
Where movers came from
- 1Santa Clara County, CA6,578$1.3B
- 2Contra Costa County, CA4,871$628.8M
- 3San Francisco County, CA3,938$642.9M
- 4San Mateo County, CA2,498$361.5M
- 5Los Angeles County, CA2,023$182.7M
- 6San Joaquin County, CA1,528$114.3M
- 7Sacramento County, CA1,027$78.0M
- 8San Diego County, CA789$70.1M
- 9Solano County, CA690$43.7M
- 10Orange County, CA638$68.4M
Where movers went
- 1Contra Costa County, CA7,141$1.0B
- 2Santa Clara County, CA4,634$742.5M
- 3San Francisco County, CA3,459$503.8M
- 4San Joaquin County, CA3,092$331.8M
- 5Los Angeles County, CA2,118$227.9M
- 6San Mateo County, CA2,026$301.6M
- 7Sacramento County, CA1,592$151.5M
- 8San Diego County, CA1,019$138.8M
- 9Solano County, CA995$85.5M
- 10King County, WA846$123.0M
Net migration by year
| Year | Net AGI | Net people |
|---|---|---|
| 2012 | +$74.0M | +3,722 |
| 2013 | +$234.2M | +2,447 |
| 2014 | +$165.5M | +809 |
| 2015 | -$53.2M | +893 |
| 2016 | -$58.2M | -6,330 |
| 2017 | -$342.4M | -16,449 |
| 2018 | -$315.8M | -11,358 |
| 2019 | -$841.7M | -12,453 |
| 2020 | -$1.1B | -22,685 |
| 2021 | -$2.6B | -35,004 |
| 2022 | -$2.5B | -26,840 |
| 2023 | -$1.4B | -18,573 |
Get the next update for Alameda County, CA
The IRS releases new migration data once a year. Drop your email and we will send the refreshed numbers when they land. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
Source: IRS Statistics of Income migration data (public domain). Covers federal income tax filers only; AGI is nominal (not inflation adjusted). These numbers describe movement of filers and their reported income, not why people moved or economic loss. Methodology and caveats.