San Joaquin County, CA
Migration of people and income, 2022–2023 filing years
Between the 2022 and 2023 filing years, San Joaquin County, CA saw a net loss of 147 tax-filing households and a net gain of 2,062 individuals. On net, the area gained $250.0M in associated adjusted gross income (AGI, nominal dollars). The largest inflow came from Alameda County; the largest outflow went to Stanislaus County. These figures cover federal income tax filers only and do not indicate why people moved.
Income (AGI) in and out
Where movers came from
- 1Alameda County, CA3,092$331.8M
- 2Santa Clara County, CA2,060$272.2M
- 3Stanislaus County, CA1,560$107.3M
- 4Sacramento County, CA1,268$94.1M
- 5Contra Costa County, CA977$83.4M
- 6San Mateo County, CA416$37.2M
- 7Los Angeles County, CA343$21.4M
- 8Solano County, CA237$13.2M
- 9Fresno County, CA224$12.6M
- 10Merced County, CA213$8.8M
Where movers went
- 1Stanislaus County, CA1,879$107.7M
- 2Sacramento County, CA1,637$98.0M
- 3Alameda County, CA1,528$114.3M
- 4Santa Clara County, CA861$75.4M
- 5Contra Costa County, CA747$56.0M
- 6Los Angeles County, CA375$20.2M
- 7San Diego County, CA249$15.5M
- 8Calaveras County, CA247$18.8M
- 9Clark County, NV247$12.1M
- 10San Mateo County, CA245$17.1M
Net migration by year
| Year | Net AGI | Net people |
|---|---|---|
| 2012 | +$3.6M | +971 |
| 2013 | -$96.4M | +806 |
| 2014 | +$64.2M | +3,678 |
| 2015 | +$77.9M | +3,158 |
| 2016 | +$114.0M | +5,524 |
| 2017 | +$132.9M | +7,940 |
| 2018 | +$127.2M | +5,336 |
| 2019 | +$46.3M | +3,830 |
| 2020 | +$189.7M | +5,095 |
| 2021 | +$264.2M | +5,394 |
| 2022 | +$237.2M | +2,662 |
| 2023 | +$250.0M | +2,062 |
Get the next update for San Joaquin County, CA
The IRS releases new migration data once a year. Drop your email and we will send the refreshed numbers when they land. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
Source: IRS Statistics of Income migration data (public domain). Covers federal income tax filers only; AGI is nominal (not inflation adjusted). These numbers describe movement of filers and their reported income, not why people moved or economic loss. Methodology and caveats.